SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 517

RAJENDRA MENON
Ram Bharosi Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.N.Gupta, Vivek Jain,

Judgment

( 1. ) THE petitioner who was owner of certain land in Survey No. 3056/30, Village Gohad, moved an application for exchange of his land with land bearing Survey No. 911. The reason for making such an application was sentimental values attached to the said land by the petitioner, because his father was cremated in the said land. The petitioner moved an application before the Commissioner, Gwalior Division, Gwalior who vide Annexure P-6 dated 17-12-1990 directed the petitioner to make proper application before the Collector, Bhind. Accordingly the application was made and Collector directed SDO to conduct enquiry and submit his report, accordingly, the report was submitted by the SDO and on the basis of the same vide order dated 2-9-1991 Annexure P-3 exchange of land was permitted subject to the condition that petitioner deposits difference of value, accordingly, an amount of Rs. 12,500. 00 was deposited by the petitioner on 26-10-1992 and the land in question was entered in the name of the petitioner, since then petitioner is in possession of the said land.

( 2. ) AFTER a lapse of 7 years vide Annexure P-1 a show cause in exercise of power of suo motu revision under Section 5










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top