SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 1267

S.S.JHA, SUBHASH SAMVATSAR
Madhya Pradesh Board of Secondary Education – Appellant
Versus
Shashi Tomer – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.D.Gupta, JUNE CHAUDHARY,

Judgment

( 1. ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal is filed by the respondents against the order passed in Writ Petition No. 2348 of 2003 passed by Honble Single Judge of this Court on 23-9-2003 whereby the learned Single Judge allowed the petition filed by respondent Nos. 1 to 27 and directed the appellant, Board, to afford opportunity of hearing to the petitioners before cancelling their results. ( 2. ) THE brief facts giving rise to the petition arc that respondent Nos. 1 to 27 are regular students from D. A. V. Higher Secondary School, Bhind and Indira Gandhi Memorial High School, Bhind. All these petitioners appeared in the examination of higher secondary from examination centre No. 31005. Nearly 400 students appeared in the examination from the aforesaid centre. Out of these students the result of 119 students were cancelled on the ground that their answers were found identically the same. Even the mistakes appeared in the answer papers were also the same in all the papers answered by these students. Thus, it was found that all these students were indulged in mass-copying and malpractice. Hence, their results were cancelled.

( 3. ) THE contention of the students is that the examination










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top