SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 1232

S.P.KHARE
Devendra Singh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
Shantibai. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S.AHLUVALIA, Pramod Verma,

Judgment

( 1. ) THIS is an appeal by the defendant No, 2 under Order 43 Rule 1 (r), CPC against the order by which an interim mandatory injunction has been issued against him to remove his belongings from the house in dispute and he has been restrained from interfering with the possession of the plaintiff No. 5 on this house.

( 2. ) BADRI, Onkar and Ramkishan were three brothers. Mathurabai was owner of a house on plot No. 3538 in Damoh. She bequeathed one third portion of this house to plaintiff No. 5 Rambharose and defendant No. 1 Narendra Kumar who are real brothers. They are sons of Onkar. Defendant No. 1 Narendra Kumar sold his share in the house by registered sale-deed dated 21-1-2003 to defendant No. 2 Devendra Singh Thakur who is a stranger to the family.

( 3. ) THE Trial Court recorded the prima facie findings that there was no partition between plaintiff No. 5 Rambharose and his brother defendant No. 1 Narendra Kumar in respect of the portion which was bequeathed to them by Mathurabai and therefore, the sale-deed executed by the defendant No. 1 in favour of the defendant No. 2 does not convey to him any specific portion of the house. It has also been found that the house in



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top