SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 624

ARUN MISHRA
Metalcraft Industries – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jailaxmi Aiyer, SUDEEP CHATTERJEE,

Judgment

( 1. ) PETITIONER in this writ petition is assailing the order (Annexure F), dated 25-11-1988 by Industries Commissioner and memo (Annexure I), dated 20th March, 1992 issued by the General Manager, District Industries Centre, Bhopal. Prayer is made to further declare that provisions of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 are not applicable on the factory and premises of the petitioner and mandamus be issued for restraining the respondents from disturbing the possession of petitioner over Plot Nos. 56 and 57-A, Govindpura, Bhopal.

( 2. ) INJUNCTION was granted to the petitioner by the order of Revenue Minister (Annexure H ). However, it appears that later an order was passed on 11-11-91 by which State Government decided not to give exemption to the petitioner which is mentioned in the bottom note of memo (Annexure I), dated 20th March, 1992. It is mentioned in the memo that possession was not taken and compensation has also not been disbursed, compensation was to be paid after taking possession. Division Bench of this Court stayed the operation of the memo (Annexure I), dated 20th March, 1992 on 7-4-1992, the order dated 7-4-1992 remains to be operative as on today.







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top