SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 1184

S.S.JHA, A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
Seema Arora – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh Kumar Arora – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.M.NAIK, K.N.Gupta, R.D.Jain, V.K.Bharadwaj,

Judgment

( 1. ) FEELING aggrieved by judgment and decree dated 8-1-2003 passed by Presiding Officer of Family Court, Gwalior in Case No. 63-A/2002 (Hindu Marriage Act), decreeing the application filed under Section 13 (1) (i-a) and Section 13 (1) (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the wife has preferred this appeal,

( 2. ) ADMITTED facts are that the appellant and respondent were married on 21-1-91 at Gwalior and thereafter a female child was born from their wedlock. ( 3. ) IN brief the case of the husband/plaintiff is that soon after the marriage he came to know that the behaviour of his wife is unusual and quarrelsome.

She happens to hurled the abuses. She also happens to take bath during odd hours in the night. On being enquired by the plaintiff/husband, the mother of the wife told that after the delivery of a child, she would become normal. But, when the husband did not notice any change, even after female child was born, he examined the appellant at Agra where she was examined by Dr. Madhuwan in August, 1994. Thereafter, she was admitted in the hospital and was treated. Thereafter, one Psychiatrist Dr. Raheja also examined the wife and ultimatel

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top