SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 1159

S.P.KHARE
AWADH BIHARI ASATI – Appellant
Versus
SHYAM BIHARI ASATI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.M.DWIVEDI, M.P.SHARMA,

Judgment

( 1. ) THIS is an appeal under Section 96, CPC by the defendants against the judgment and decree by which the plaintiffs suit for declaration that the registered sale-deed dated 10-3-2000 (Ex. P-9) executed by the defendant No. 2 in favour of the defendant No. 3 is void and not binding on the plaintiffs has been decreed. The defendant No. 3 has been directed to deliver possession of the house in dispute to the plaintiffs.

( 2. ) IT is not in dispute that Bhagwandas Asati owned and possessed agricultural lands and houses in 3 Villages Nirandpur, Sarra and Maharajpur. He had 3 sons Kunjbihari, Shyambihari and Awadhbihari. The agricultural lands were divided amongst his sons by a registered partition deed in the year 1969. The houses in these villages were not the subject matter of partition in the year 1969. Kunjbihari died and the plaintiff are his legal representatives. Awadhbihari is defendant No. 1 and Anurag Asati (defendant No. 2) is his son. Anurag Asati executed a registered sale-deed mentioned above in favour of defendant No. 3 Smt. Renuka Bai in respect of the house in Village Nirandpur. She has taken possession of this house.

( 3. ) THE plaintiffs case is that there







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top