RAJARATNAM, DIPAK MISRA
M. P. Employees State Insurance – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
( 1. ) INVOKING the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have prayed for to declare Rules 4. 5 and 5. 2 of Madhya Pradesh Medical and Dental Postgraduate Admission (In-Service) Rules, 2003, as ultra vires the Constitution of India and further they run counter to the decisions rendered by the Apex Court.
( 2. ) THE facts which are essential to be stated are that the petitioner No. 1, a registered Association of Insurance Medical Officers working under the Government of Madhya Pradesh, represented by its President. The petitioner Nos. 1-A and 2 are the doctors working as Insurance Medical Officers. It is putforth in the petition that the grievance agitated is both collective and individualistic. The petitioner No. 1-A passed MBBS Examination from Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Indore, in the year 1991 and thereafter joined in service as Insurance Medical Officer/assistant Surgeon under the Labour Department in Employees State Insurance Services after being selected through Public Service Commission in the year 1996. The petitioner No. 2 passed her MBBS Examination in the year 1989 and after her post- graduati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.