SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 1049

RAJARATNAM, DIPAK MISRA
M. P. Employees State Insurance – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.PILLAI, Sanjay K.Agrawal, Shobha Menon, V.K.TANKHA,

Judgment

( 1. ) INVOKING the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have prayed for to declare Rules 4. 5 and 5. 2 of Madhya Pradesh Medical and Dental Postgraduate Admission (In-Service) Rules, 2003, as ultra vires the Constitution of India and further they run counter to the decisions rendered by the Apex Court.

( 2. ) THE facts which are essential to be stated are that the petitioner No. 1, a registered Association of Insurance Medical Officers working under the Government of Madhya Pradesh, represented by its President. The petitioner Nos. 1-A and 2 are the doctors working as Insurance Medical Officers. It is putforth in the petition that the grievance agitated is both collective and individualistic. The petitioner No. 1-A passed MBBS Examination from Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Indore, in the year 1991 and thereafter joined in service as Insurance Medical Officer/assistant Surgeon under the Labour Department in Employees State Insurance Services after being selected through Public Service Commission in the year 1996. The petitioner No. 2 passed her MBBS Examination in the year 1989 and after her post- graduati



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top