SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 930

SHANTANU KEMKAR, R.V.RAVEENDRAN
Roshanlal Maravi – Appellant
Versus
Shambhoo Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Atul Nema, P.R.Bhave, R.K.GUPTA, RAJNEESH GUPTA, VIVEK
AVASTHY,

Judgment

( 1. ) THE post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Bangawan (Shahdol) was reserved for a Scheduled Tribe candidate in 1999-2000 elections. The first respondent, claiming that he belongs to Gond community, contested the election and was declared elected as Sarpanch on 5-1-2000.

( 2. ) THE Naib Tehsildar, Kotma issued a letter dated 22-12-2000 requiring the first respondent to submit documents in proof of his caste on 23-12-2000. In pursuance of it, he produced a caste certificate dated 27-10-1997 issued by the Naib Tehsildar, Kotma showing that he belonged to gond caste. In the meanwhile, it would appear that one Leeladhar Sharma (fourth respondent) filed a complaint that the first respondent did not belong to a Scheduled Tribe. After a preliminary enquiry, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Anuppur (third respondent herein), issued a notice dated 23-2-2001 to first respondent alleging that his enquiry revealed that the first respondent belonged to Village Devnandpur, District Gajipur, Uttar Pradesh and he was not a member of Scheduled Tribe and, therefore, he could not have contested the election for the post of Sarpanch of Bangawan Gram Panchayat, which was reserved for a Scheduled













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top