SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 57

DIPAK MISRA
Shivkumari Dubey – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Komal Patel, Rahul Jain,

Judgment

( 1. ) DOES the factual score of this case gives rise to a feeling, the petitioner Smt. Shivkumari Dubey, a sectogenerian has spoken too much in the line of thinking the lady speaketh too much, or has she in an innocuous, innocent, non-inhibited and non-reflective manner has exposed the indifferent, inhuman, non-concern, hibernative proclivity, unceremonial delineation of the legitimate and lawful expectation of a retired person by the authorities by which the hope of a retired employee to get the retiral benefit, pronto gets crucified and the life and the essence of life is converted by such inaction to the shadow of life ? Stories may state that as long as shadow exists life may continue but in reality the shadow of life is not the substitution of life. Life, a glorious and magnificent gift of God, the Almighty, is not to be dealt with in such an inglorious manner by the persons who are in the helm of affairs as the files relating to retiral dues can not be metamorphosed to a cushion, a pad, to be utilised at ones own will, desire, whims, caprice or fancy. It requires immediate attention and prompt action and quick disposal.

( 2. ) SUBMISSION of Mr. Komal Patel, learned Co





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top