SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 215

KUMAR RAJARATNAM, DIPAK MISRA
Amit Kumar Aritwal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MRIGENDRA SINGH, S.K.Yadav, Samdarshi Tiwari,

Judgment

( 1. ) THE essential question of law being common to these two cases they were heard analogously and are disposed of by this common order. For the sake of clarity we think it appropriate to state the facts in each case in brief. ( 2. ) IN W. P. No. 27632/03 the factual matrix as has been exposited is that the petitioner applied for entrance examination for post graduation course which was conducted as per the M. P. Medical and Dental Post Graduation Entrance Examination Rules, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules ). The written test was held on 9-3-2003. The petitioner secured 573 marks out of 900 and was placed at serial No. 232 in the waiting list. The first counselling was held in the month of May, 2003 wherein the candidates from the merit list were called for allotment of P. G. seats in different medical colleges. The subsequent counsellings, as setforth, were held on 23-7-2003 and 25-7-2003. Thereafter as some seats from the assistance surgeon quota have been reverted to be filled up from the candidates in the waiting list the recounselling was held on 6-9-2003 to 9-9-2003 and all the wait listed candidates of general category and OBC category candidates were ca


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top