SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 283

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
Amar Nath – Appellant
Versus
Nathuram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Atul Awasthy,

Judgment

( 1. ) THIS appeal has been preferred by plaintiffs being aggrieved by judgment and decree dated 14-9-1988 passed by 8th Additional District Judge, Jabalpur dismissing their appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated 11-1-1982 passed by the Trial Court holding that partition took place in the year 1954 and in pursuance to that partition the parties arc possessing their respective shares.

( 2. ) THE suit was originally filed by Moorat Lal Tiwari and on his death the present appellants were brought on record. The original plaintiff Moorat Lal filed suit against Nathuram, Lakhan Lai and Smt. Malida Bai. Moorat Lal was having two wives. From his first wife Nathuram defendant No. 1 was born.

After the death of his first wife, Moorat Lal married to Malida Bai (defendant No. 3) and Lakhan Lal (defendant No. 2) is his son from his second wife. Amarnath, Yogendranath and Ravindra Nath, who were brought on record as plaintiffs on the death of the original plaintiff Moorat Lal are his grand-children, they are the sons of Lakhan Lai.

( 3. ) MOORAT Lal filed suit for declaration that the suit property is his self acquired property and as such he is the owner of the said property s








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top