SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 681

S.K.PANDE
Ram Pramod Kacchi – Appellant
Versus
Gayadeen – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.N.Pathak, Suyash Tripathi, U.K.Sharma,

Judgment

( 1. ) BEING aggrieved by the judgment-decree dated 22-9-90, passed by II ADJ, Sidhi in C. A. No. 1-A/89, reversing, the judgment-decree dated 31-1-87, passed by III Civil Judge Class II, Shahdol in C. S. No. 33-A/86, plaintiff/appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 100, CPC.

( 2. ) THE appeal has been heard on the following substantial question of law :-

"whether the Lower Appellate Court was justified in dismissing the plaintiffs suit on the finding that the plaintiff/appellant was out of possession and, therefore, the suit for declaration was not maintainable ?"

OR "whether the Lower Appellate Court should have afforded an opportunity to the plaintiff/appellant to amend the plaint and claim the relief of possession also ?"

( 3. ) ADMITTEDLY suit land Khasra No. 501, area 0. 22 acres, Village Panchgaon, Tehsil Sohagur, District Shahdol is recorded in the name of plaintiff/appellant Rampramod. On a portion of this land, residential houses were constructed by defendant/respondents, however, the remaining portion of land described in Para 4 of the plaint-map attached therewith, remained in exclusive possession of plaintiff/appellant. Defendant/respondents on 25-2-78,



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top