SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 836

S.K.KULSHRESTHA, S.L.JAIN
Diwakar Rao Makode – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.S.PATEL, S.C.Dutt, S.K.GANGRADE, SIDDHARTH DATTA,

Judgment

( 1. ) THIS judgment shall govern the disposal of this appeal as well as Criminal Appeal No. 1198/2001 (Ramnarayan Bishnoi v. State of M. P.) and Criminal Appeal No. 1233/2001 (Brij Bhushan Sharma v. State of M. P. ).

( 2. ) AS all these appeals arise out of the judgment passed by IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Betul in Special Case No. 13/91, whereby all the appellants were acquitted of an offence punishable under Section 3 (1) (xii) of the SC/st (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (henceforth, the Act) but all of them have been convicted for an offence punishable under Section 376 (2) (g) of the Indian Penal Code (for short, the IPC) and appellant Brij Bhushan Sharma has been sentenced to imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 25,000/- and in default whereof with further imprisonment for 2 1/2 years, appellants Ramnarayan Bishnoi and Diwakar Rao Makode have been sentenced to R. I. for 7 years each with fine of Rs. 10,000/- each in default whereof R. I. for one year each, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

( 3. ) THE prosecution case as portrayed during trial is that prosecutrix Sukkobai (P. W. 1) is the wife of Sadhu (P. W. 3) and resi
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top