SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 1195

A.P.SHRIVASTAVA, K.K.LAHOTI
Choudhary Minerals and Chemicals – Appellant
Versus
Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.TIWARI, R.K.CHOUDHARY, U.S.Bhatt,

Judgment

( 1. ) SHRI U. S. Bhatt, learned counsel with Shri P. K. Tiwari and Shri R. K. Choudhary, learned counsel for appellant.

( 2. ) THIS appeal is admitted on following substantial questions of law :1. Whether the CESTAT committed an error in not restoring the appeal filed by the appellant which was dismissed for the non-compliance of the stay order while the appellant deposited the amount of duty and penalty though belatedly and sought restoration of the appeal by filing an application ?

2. Whether the appeal filed by the appellant was restorable after its dismissal for non-compliance of the stay order when the appellant was facing financial hardship and was not in a position to deposit the amount within time period granted by the CESTAT and after dismissal of the appeal deposited the amount and sought restoration of the appeal by explaining circumstances in which amount was not deposited ?

( 3. ) ISSUE notice to the respondent on payment of process fee within a period of one week by registered A. D. Ad interim relief

( 4. ) LEARNED counsel for appellant submits that respondent is affecting the recovery in respect of the interest on duty and penalty which is Rs. 2,46,0007-while th


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top