SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 98

A.K.AWASTHY
Sukhram – Appellant
Versus
Sarjubai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.V.BHAGVAT, T.M.PANJVANI,

Judgment

( 1. ) THE appellant/defendant No. 1 has filed the Misc. Appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as "the Code") against the order dated 24-7-2003 passed in Civil Regular Appeal No. 10-A/2003 by learned XVIIIth Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Indore, whereby the judgment and decree dated 8-9-2000 passed in Civil Suit No. 255-A/1999 by learned 1st Civil Judge, Class-II, Indore, was set aside and the case was remanded to the Trial Court for retrial after impleading the two sisters of the appellant as a party in the suit under Order I Rule 10 of the Code.

( 2. ) THE admitted facts of the case are that respondent Nos. 1 and 2/plaintiffs are the wife and son of Badrilal. That Badrilal and appellant/defendant No. 1 Sukhram are the real brothers. It is also not in dispute that the suit property is ancestral and situated in Village Piplya, Tehsil and District Indore and that the defendant No. 1 is in possession of the alleged ancestral property.

( 3. ) THE case of the plaintiffs is that the whereabouts of Badrilal is not known from more than 7 years and on account of his civil death, the plaintiffs have become the owner of







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top