A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
Baijnath Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
( 1. ) BY this writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the pregnability of the Revenue Recovery Certificate (hereinafter referred to as rrc) dated 19-8-99 (Annexure P-1) being void, illegal and against the law. The petitioner has further prayed to declare by appropriate writ or order that the impugned action of the respondents is arbitrary, illegal and without any authority, power and jurisdiction.
( 2. ) AS per the averments made in the petition, the petitioner is a B-class contractor. He entered into an agreement with the respondents for construction of Dammari approach road from 0 km. to 3 kms. His tender was accepted being the lowest and he was directed to complete the work within 4 months, i. e. , upto 30-9-1984. The petitioner commenced his work from 1-4-1984 and looking to the approaching rainy season completed maximum possible work. The petitioner, on the basis of accepted measurement, submitted his first running bill to the tune of Rs. 3,47,895/which is 80% of the total amount of contract.
( 3. ) AS per the petitioner, the work undertaken by him was earth work collection of morram with boxing, spreadi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.