SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 620

P.K.JAISWAL, S.S.JHA
Harmesh Chandra Dua – Appellant
Versus
Nagar Palika Nigam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JITENDRA MAHESVARI, P.D.Bidua,

Judgment

( 1. ) THIS appeal is filed by plaintiff against dismissal of his suit.

( 2. ) PLAINTIFF has filed a suit for declaration and perpetual injunction against the respondent. Plaintiff claimed that he owned a immovable property bearing House No. 40/955/3 (Old) now 40/1024 and the number of said house is again changed to 44/1034/1, which is situated at Jadhav Mahal, Khasgi Baazar, Lashkar, Gwalior. Plaintiff contended that he has submitted a map for construction of the house under Section 294 of the M. P. Municipal Corporation Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" ). The said map has not been approved by the defendant within the statutory period, therefore, sanction was under the deemed permission under Section 295 (3) of the Act. In spite of repeated requests defendant have not cared to consider the sanction approval of the map, therefore, under the deemed permission construction was carried out by the plaintiff. Plaintiff claimed that since permission has not been granted to him for construction he has suffered loss and he has filed a suit and prayed therein that the plaintiff should be allowed to continue his construction and defendant be restrained from obstructing the co













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top