SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 394

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
State of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Ramsingh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.R.Kochatta, S.S.GARG,

Judgment

( 1. ) THIS second appeal has been preferred by the defendant, against the judgment and decree of reversal passed by the Appellate Court decreeing the suit of the plaintiff.

( 2. ) IN brief the suit of plaintiff is that Village Nipanya Tonk was the Zamindari village of erstwhile Gwalior Estate and plaintiff was the then Zamindar of the said village. On 2-10-1951 the Zamindari system was abolished on account of the enforcement of Madhya Bharat Zamindari Abolition Act Samvat 2008 (Act No. 13 of 1951), hereinafter referred to as "the Act". According to plaintiff the suit land was in the self cultivation of plaintiff soon before the date of vesting, i. e. , 2-10-1951 as he started cultivation only soon before the date of vesting. Since the land was in the self cultivation of plaintiff before the date of vesting, he became "pacca Krishak" by operation of law and his name was also mutated as such in the revenue record. However, in Samvat 2012 plaintiff was shown as trespasser in the revenue record and this entry was made behind back of plaintiff without issuing notice to him and, therefore, since the suit land was in self cultivation of plaintiff before the date of vesting, he bec






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top