SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 990

S.K.KULSHRESTHA, N.K.MODY
Director General, Employees State Insurance Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Puroshottam – Respondent


Judgment

( 1. ) BEING aggrieved by the order dated 13-12-2004 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, Circuit Bench, Indore in O. A. No. 1002/2000 whereby the petition filed by the respondent was allowed and the order dated 17-4-2000 passed by the petitioner was quashed with a further direction to the petitioner to treat the respondent to have continuously worked till the date of actual superannuation and grant him arrears of salary and other emoluments including increments and to get his pensionary benefits re-fixed accordingly, the present petition has been filed.

( 2. ) SHORT facts of the case are that the respondent was in service of petitioner and was working as Manager. Respondent vide letter dated 31-12-1999 tendered three months notice for voluntary retirement with effect from 31-3-2000. The resignation was accepted by the Competent Authority vide order dated 10-2-2000, before 31-3-2000. On 22-3-2000, i. e. , 10 days before the last date of expiry of notice period the respondent moved an application whereby it was submitted that the respondent is withdrawing the notice dated 31-12-1999 whereby the respondent intimated that the respondent wants to retire from his












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top