SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 908

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
Keshav Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Bhuwani Bai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.N.AGRAWAL, M.L.JAISWAL, Manoj Kushawaha, SUDESH VERMA,

Judgment

( 1. ) THE defendants, feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the First Appellate Court whereby the judgment and decree of the Trial Court dismissing the suit of plaintiff/respondent No. 1, has been set aside, has preferred this second appeal.

( 2. ) IN brief, the suit of plaintiff is that she is the daughter of Kaushalya Bai wd/o Udaybhan. According to plaint averments, Kaushalya Bai was the owner of the suit property, the description whereof has been mentioned in the plaint. The plaintiff being her daughter, after the death of Kaushalya Bai inherited the right, title and interest in the suit property. It has also been pleaded in Paras 7, 8 and 11 of the plaint that a forged and fictitious Will has been prepared by the defendants and by that forged and fictitious Will of Kaushalya Bai, no right, title and interest are devolved in them. The plaintiff further pleaded that the alleged Will dated 26-2-1978 alleged to have been executed by Kaushalya Bai in favour of defendant Nos. 1 and 2 be declared as null and void. In the plaint, the State of Madhya Pradesh has been arrayed as a formal party. The suit was filed by the plaintiff on 20-12-1979.

( 3. ) THE defenda
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top