SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 292

DIPAK MISRA, SUBHADA R.WAGHMARE
Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Mantola. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.Samaiya, R.S.PATEL, Shailendra Samaiya,

Judgment

( 1. ) IN this appeal preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for brevity the Act) the insurer, namely, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, has called in question the legal propriety of the award dated 11-4-2002 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Tikamgarh (in short the Tribunal) in Claim Case No. 26/99.

( 2. ) THE facts in a nut shell are that the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 initiated an action under Section 166 of the Act on the foundation that on 13-2-1999 their son, Jagdish, aged about 15 years was travelling in a bus bearing Registration No. MP. 15-D/5695 from Maharajganj to Chhatarpur. The young boy, Jagdish, was sitting on the roof of the bus and about 8. 00 p. m. while he was on roof top of the bus it dashed against a Mango tree as a result of which he fell down and sustained serious injuries. He was carried to Chhatarpur Hospital and thereafter to the Gwalior where he breathed his last on 16-2-1999. As the driver of the bus was driving in a rash and negligent manner, a Crime No. 24/99 was instituted against him for the offences punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 304-A of the Indian Penal Code (for short the IPC ). It was contended in


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top