SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 364

DIPAK MISRA
Suresh Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
Atarlal Verma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAJESH TIWARI, Vinod Mehta, VIVEK RUSIA,

Judgment

( 1. ) THE centroidal issue that emerges for consideration in this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is whether the respondent No. 1 is entitled under law to hold the post of Member of Jila Panchayat, Chhindwara though he was elected in the election held in December, 2004 from Ward No. 19 of Jila Panchayat, Chhindwara reserved for Other Backward Classes.

( 2. ) THE facts which are requisite to be stated for adjudication of this writ petition are that the petitioner is a resident of Ward No. 7 and his name finds place at Serial No. 407 of the voters list of Gram Markahand which comes under the Zila Panchayat, Chhindwara. The respondent No. 1 was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Navegaon Makaria in the year 1994. During his tenure the villagers made number of complaints to the Sub-Divisional Officer alleging that he has misappropriated the Government fund. An inquiry was made and a show-cause notice was issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer under Section 40 (b) of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 (for brevity the Act ). The charges levelled against him were that he had got sanction of Rs. 10,000/- to ea





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top