SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 410

S.A.NAQVI
Girraj S/o Banwari Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.P.DWIVEDI, S.P.Bhatnagar,

Judgment

( 1. ) THIS revision petition is preferred by the petitioner Girraj said to be a delinquent juvenile has been convicted by impugned order dated 3-3-2006 passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, Guna in Criminal Appeal No.

95/2006 whereby confirming the order dated 1-3-2006 rejecting bail application of petitioner.

( 2. ) PETITIONER has been charged for committing offence under Sections 302 and 376 of I. P. C. and he is under custody in connection with crime No. 17/2006 registered by police station Vijaypur tehsil Raghogarh district Guna. ft has been observed by appellate court in para 10 of its order that date of birth of delinquent juvenile is 4-10-19s8 and he is a juvenile. Both the courts below rejected the bail application of petitioner on the ground that if petitioner is released on bail, his release would defeat the ends of justice. Aggrieved by impugned order, under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the "act") preferred this revision petition.

( 3. ) IT has been vehemently argued by learned Counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is a delinquent juvenile. There is no iota of evidence that if h











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top