SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 1224

S.C.VYAS
SANJAY – Appellant
Versus
RAJEEV – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AGRAWAL, M.Jain,

Judgment

( 1. ) HEARD finally with the consent of both the parties.

( 2. ) THIS is a petition filed under Section 482 of Cr. PC quashment of the order passed by JMFC, Indore on 1-2-05 in Criminal Case No. 1538/01, which was confirmed by the order dated 24-6-06 passed in Criminal Revision no. 235/05 by First Additional Sessions Judge, Indore. The present petitioner is facing trial for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable instrument Act before learned Magistrate. During trial, two interlocutory applications, one under Section 91 of the Cr. PC and second under Sections 45, 65 and 67 of the Evidence Act were moved on behalf of the present petitioner, before the learned Magistrate. Those two applications were considered by the trial Court and were dismissed. That order was confirmed by the Revisional court also.

( 3. ) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the signature on the cheque are not in dispute in this case, and as per the defence of the present petitioner, the amount of cheque was already paid to the complainant, but later on complainant interpolated in that cheque and entered another date and made certain entries and then presented the cheque in




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top