DIPAK MISRA, SHUBHADA R.WAGHMARE
KANCHHEDI LAL – Appellant
Versus
PRESIDING OFFICER – Respondent
( 1. ) IN this intra-Court appeal preferred under Section 2 of Madhya Pradesh uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyayapeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 (for brevity the Act), the defensibility and legal acceptability of order dated 16-5-2007 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (S) No. 3355/2007 is called in question.
( 2. ) MR. N. S. Ruprah, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 2 has raised a preliminary objection that the writ appeal is not maintainable as the order passed by the learned Single Judge has emanated from a proceeding before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court (hereinafter referred to as the CGIT-cum-Labour Court) which had culminated in an award whereby the CGIT-cum-Labour Court passed the award ex parte and eventually, declined to interfere in the order of dismissal passed by the Management against the workman. As a preliminary objection has been raised, it is obligatory on the part of this Court to deal with the same.
( 3. ) MR. N. S. Ruprah, learned Counsel for the respondents has commended us to sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Act. The said proviso reads as under:-"2. Appeal to the Division Bench of the High Court
Jaidev Siddha Vs Jaiprakash Siddha
Hari Vishnu Kamath Vs Ahmad Ishaque
CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY,BANGALORE Vs Khan Saheb Abdul Shukoor
MANGALBHAI Vs RADHYSHYAM s/o PARISCHANDRA AGARWAL
RUPA ASHOK HURRA Vs Ashok Hurra
NAGENDRA NATH BORA Vs Commissioner of Hills Division and Appeals,Assam
UMAJI KESHAO MESHRAM Vs RADHIKABAI,WIDOW OF ANANDRAO BANAPRKAR
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.