SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 416

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
JETHANAND AND COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
MOHAN AND COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MADAN SINGH, S.A.Sobhani, Vikram Singh,

Judgment

( 1. ) THIS appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed by the defendant against the impugned and decree dated 1-5-1997 passed by learned 5th Additional District Judge, Bhopal in Civil Suit No. 93-B/1997 whereby the suit of plaintiff/respondent has been decreed upto the extent of Rs. 80,254/-with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.

( 2. ) A suit for realization of Rs. 1,26,225. 00 has been filed by plaintiff/respondent on the averment that plaintiff-firm is carrying on business of wholesale of English liquor, which is being carried under the supervision of excise Inspector and who supervises every account of plaintiff and also supervises the liquor which is being purchase by retail shopkeepers. The said excise Inspector also supervise that how much of the English liquor is being sold to the retailer by the plaintiff-firm. Without obtaining permission from the excise department the plaintiff cannot run the said business of wholesale of english liquor. Similarly, every retail shopkeeper is also obliged to obtain permit from the Excise department to purchase the English liquor.

( 3. ) IN Para 3 of the plaint, it has been pleaded that English liq



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top