W.A.SHAH
HARIPRASAD – Appellant
Versus
DHANNU SHYAMLAL – Respondent
( 1. ) THIS second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure arises out of judgment and decree dated 28-6-2003 passed by learned Additional district Judge, Kannod, District Dewas in Regular Civil Appeal No. 22-A/2000. By the judgment impugned, judgment and decree vide dated 22-3-2000 passed by the learned Civil judge, Class-I. Kannod in Civil Suit No. 144-A/95 has been confirmed whereby declaration in favour of the plaintiffs (respondent No. 1 through L. Rs. and respondent Nos. 2 and 3) has been made that they are the bhumiswami of the disputed land; order of the Sub Divisional Officer under section 170-B of the M. P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 ("code" hereafter) is in operative and the other side has been restrained from making an interference in the possession of the plaintiffs/respondents.
( 2. ) IT has been concurrently found by Courts below that the aboriginal tribe Bhumiswami Ramprasad sold his disputed land on 1-6-1958 to one Dhanya and also delivered to him its possession and executed registered sale-deed latter on 22-4-1965. Then Dhanya sold it to Dhannu (deceased plaintiff No. 1) and gave him possession and executed its registered sale-deed on 7-5-1977.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.