SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(MP) 479

DIPAK MISRA, R.S.JHA
ANSHUL TOMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashok Lalwani, B.VEDE, MOHD.ALI, P.K.Kaurav, Samdarshi Tiwari, Sheel Nagu,

Judgment

( 1. ) IN this batch of writ petitions the petitioners have called in question the substantiality of the decision taken by the Committee for admission Procedures for Professional Institutions (hereinafter referred to as the committee) whereby the Committee has called the admissions of the petitioners to the respondent No. 3, R. D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain (for short the college) on the ground that they were not entitled to be admitted under the Non resident Indian (NRI) quota. That being the centripodal issue in all the writ petitions they were heard analogously and are disposed of by a singular order. For the sake of clarity and convenience the facts of Writ Petition 13500/2007 are adumbrated herein.

( 2. ) THE petitioners have taken admission in the respondent-College in respect of 15% NRI quota on the foundation that they have been sponsored by the NRI. It is contended that the College was satisfied with regard to the status of nri sponsorship of the students/candidates but the Committee took up the matter and cancelled the admission on the ground that they are neither the children of nris nor the wards. It is averred in the petition that the petitioners come within















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top