SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(MP) 918

PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA
GOMTI BAI TAMRAKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.K.UPADHYAY, MOHD.NASIR, P.N.DUBEY,

Judgment

( 1. ) THE writ petition has been filed challenging the notification dated 28th march, 2008 issued under Section 4 (Annexure P-l) and the notification dated 15th May, 2008 (Annexure P-2) issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition act.

( 2. ) THE case of the petitioners is that the petitioner No. 1 is owner of the house situated on Hiraganj Tiraha and the petitioner No. 2 is the owner of the house situated on Garg Chowk, Malviya Ganj, Katni. The notification dated 28th March, 2008 issued under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act was published in the M. P. State Gazette dated 25-4-2008. Thereafter, the declaration under Section 6 was published on 15-5-2008. In the present petition, the notifications under Section 4 (1) of the Act as well as declaration under section 6 are under challenge.

( 3. ) LEARNED Counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the notification under Section 4 (1) of the Act is vague inasmuch as it does not contain the full details of the land proposed to be acquired and also the public purpose is not specific. The notification is so vague that the petitioners have been deprived of their right under Section 5-A of the Act. He further submit

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top