SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(MP) 425

ARUN MISHRA, PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA
ABHINEETA ELIZABETH LALL – Appellant
Versus
BARKATULLAH UNIVERSITY, BHOPAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JASMIT GHANA, P.K.Kaurav,

Judgment

( 1. ) PETITIONER in this writ petition has assailed vires of clause 26 (1) Ordinance 6 framed under M. P. Vishwavidyalala Adhiniyam, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Adhiniyam) and to direct the respondent to revaluate the answer-sheets of the petitioner.

( 2. ) PETITIONER has submitted that petitioner is a student of L. L. B. Ist year in barkatullah University, Bhopal and has obtained total 491 marks out of 900 in l. L. B. Ist year. She had applied for revaluation of her answer-sheets in two subjects which is permissible and there is an increase of 32 marks in overall result as apparent from mark-sheet (Ex. P. 3) issued after revaluation. Under clause 26 of the Ordinance 6 there is limit to apply for revaluation of only two subjects. Petitioner has been meritorious throughout her academic career, thus, she has prayed for revaluation of other answer-sheets also. Petitioner has submitted that she has done better than the marks awarded to her in other papers in which revaluation has not been done, consequently she has preferred writ petition.

( 3. ) THE University in its return has denied the averments made in the petition contending that Ordinance 6 of the Barkatullah Uni









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top