SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 400

SHANTANU KEMKAR
PARWATI BAI THAKUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K.SHARMA, Yogesh Dhande,

Judgment

( 1. ) HEARD.

( 2. ) BY filing this petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of india the petitioner has challenged the order dated 20-9-2006 passed by the additional Commissioner, Jabalpur Division in Case No. 298-B-121/2004-05. ( 3. ) THE third respondent had filed an election petition under Section 122 of the M. P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 (act for short) before the second respondent Prescribed Authority under the Act, challenging the election of the petitioner on the post of President, Zila panchayat, Jabalpur. In the said election petition the petitioner filed a preliminary objection in regard to the maintainability of the election petition on the ground of non-compliance of Rule 3 (2) of M. P. Panchayats (Election petitions, Corrupt Practices and Disqualification for Membership) Rules, 1995 (for short rules ). The said objection was rejected by the second respondent vide order dated 13-1-2006 (Annexure P-4 ). Against the said order the petitioner filed a Writ Petition No. 3380/2006 before this Court. The said writ petition was allowed vide order dated 3-4-2006 and the order dated 13-1-2006 passed by the second respondent was quashed and






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top