SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 152

U.C.MAHESHWARI
JAMSHED BAHADUR – Appellant
Versus
RASHIDA BEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.N.Fakhruddin,

Judgment

( 1. ) THE appellant/defendant No. 1 has directed this appeal under section 100 of the CPC being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 21-7-93 passed by the District Judge, Sehore in Civil Regular Appeal No. 24-A/93 confirming the ex parte judgment and decree dated 2-3-93 passed by the iind Civil Judge Class II, Sehore in Civil Original Suit No. 158-A/92, whereby the suit of the respondent for possession of the disputed land and mesne profit, has been decreed ex parte.

( 2. ) THE brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that the respondent herein filed the aforesaid suit for possession and mesne profit against the appellant with respect of the agricultural land bearing Survey No. 371/1/1 area 2 acre, situated in Village Bhaukhedi Tehsil Ichchawar. After filing the suit, the summons was directed against the appellant. The same was not served for two occasions, on which, the respondent filed an application under Order 5 Rule 20 of the CPC for substituted service. The service of the notice by affixture was directed by the Trial Court vide order dated 17-12-92. In compliance of such order, as alleged, in spite of service of the summons, the appellant did not appear on th



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top