SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 640

SHANTANU KEMKAR
ANGAD SINGH RATHORE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Arvind Gokhale, Sachin Bhatnagar,

Judgment

( 1. ) PETITIONER is working on the post of Inspector in the home (Police Department) of the State Government.

( 2. ) A notice dt. 15. 05. 06 (Annexure A/2) was issued to the petitioner by the third respondent Inspector General of Police, Ujjain to show cause as to why departmental proceedings be not initiated against him for the misconduct alleged in the said notice. The petitioner submitted reply (Annexure A/3) on 25. 05. 06 to the said show cause notice and denied the charges levelled against him. However instead of taking any- decision on the basis of the said reply, the third respondent inspector General of Police, Ujjain Zone issued him yet another show cause notice dt. 14. 06. 06 (Annexure A/4) on the same facts. On receipt of the said show cause notice, having regard to the punishment proposed in the said notice which was not very severe the petitioner thought it proper to. accept the punishment proposed in the said notice. He therefore submitted his reply dt. 24. 06. 06 (Annexure P/5) and requested for lenient punishment. On receipt of the petitioners reply dt. 24. 06. 06 (Annexure A/5) the third respondent considered the same and having regard to the nature of misc
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top