SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 346

U.C.MAHESHWARI, R.S.GARG
H S SIDHU – Appellant
Versus
DEVENDRA BAPNA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K.DIXIT, K.K.TRIVEDI, V.K.SHUKLA,

Judgment

( 1. ) THE appellant being aggrieved by Order dated 4. 3. 2008 passed in w. P. No. 23798/2003 (OA. No. 927/1997) and W. P. (S) No. 1119/2005 has come to this Court with a submission that the learned single Judge was absolutely unjustified in holding that the appellant could not be considered higher in merits in comparison to the original petitioner/respondent no. 1 and others.

( 2. ) UNDISPUTEDLY the respondent no. 1/original petitioner is senior to the present appellant. When their cases for promotion to the post of Joint Director, Fisheries were under consideration a departmental promotion committee was required to consider their cases. The committee consisted of Mr. M. M. Hussain, Member, public Service Commission, Shri Prem Prakash Mathur, Secretary, Department of Fisheries, Shri V. L. Shitole, Director, Fisheries Department and Shri A. K. Jain, Under Secretary, State of Madhya Pradesh, Department of Fisheries. It is to be seen that the said committee met on 6. 7. 1996. It is also to be seen that an earlier committee consisting of Shri MM. Hussain, Member, Madhya Pradesh public Service Commissioner, Shri Sirjjiyas Minj, Secretary, Fisheries Department, shri V. L. Shitole














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top