SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 45

P.K.JAISWAL
SHIV CHARAN BHURTIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Alok Kumar, Samdarshi Tiwari

Judgment

P.K.Jaiswal, J.

( 1. ) Heard. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 29/12/2008 by which respondent No.3- Collector, Shahdol, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 86(2) of M.P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 (in short the Act) terminated the petitioner from the post of Panchayat Karmi, Gram Panchayat, Bocharo, Janpad Panchayat, Beohari and in exercise of powers conferred under Section 69 of the Act de-notified him from the post of Panchayat Secretary.

( 2. ) By the impugned order, respondent No.3 has found gross irregularities which were committed by the petitioner while he was discharging the functions of Panchayat Secretary. Up-sarpanch, Panchas and other villagers of Gram Panchayat, Bocharo have made a complaint (Annexure-R/4-1) against the petitioner who was then working as Panchayat Karmi of Gram Panchayat, Bocharo in which various allegations were made with respect of his working. On this complaint, Shri S.K. Shukla, Dy. Director, Panchayat and Social Justice was appointed as Enquiry Officer. The said enquiry officer conducted the enquiry and submitted his enquiry repo














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top