SHANTANU KEMKAR, S.K.SETH
Mankunwarbai W/o Shantilal Patidar – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Kumar S/o Ramsukh Patidar – Respondent
Shantanu Kemkar, J.
1. By this petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner (Defendant No. 1) has challenged the order dated 31-10-2007 passed by 1st Civil Judge, Class I, Neemuch in Civil Suit No. 74-A of 2005, by which the Plaintiff's applications filed under Order I Rule 10 and under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short Code of Civil Procedure) have been allowed.
2. Briefly stated, the Plaintiffs (Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 herein) have filed a Civil Suit on 6-9-2005 against the Petitioner as also against the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 (Plaintiffs' father and mother) and 9 (State Government) seeking declaration of partition and permanent injunction in respect to the agricultural land. It was alleged that the said land being ancestral property of their family, which fell in their share as per the family arrangement carried out 5-7 years back, the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4, could not have sold the same to the Petitioner (Defendant No. 1).
3. The Petitioner who had purchased the said land from the Defendant Nos. 2 and 3 by way of a registered sale deed executed on 4-7-2005 for consideration of Rs. 3.24 lakhs filed written statement alongwi
1. Vidyabai and Ors. v. Padmalatha and Anr. (2009) 2 SCC 409 : AIR 2009 SC 1433;
2. Sushil Kumar Jain v. Manoj Kumar and Anr. (2009) 14 SCC 38;
5. Rajesh Kumar Aggrawal and Ors. v. K.K. Modi and Ors. (2006) 4 SCC 385 : AIR 2006 SC 1647;
7. Ajendra Prasadji N. Pandey v. Swami Keshav Prasadji (2006) 12 SCC 1
6. Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India (2005) 6 SCC 344;
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.