SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 556

SHANTANU KEMKAR, S.K.SETH
Mankunwarbai W/o Shantilal Patidar – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Kumar S/o Ramsukh Patidar – Respondent


ORDER

Shantanu Kemkar, J.

1. By this petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner (Defendant No. 1) has challenged the order dated 31-10-2007 passed by 1st Civil Judge, Class I, Neemuch in Civil Suit No. 74-A of 2005, by which the Plaintiff's applications filed under Order I Rule 10 and under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short Code of Civil Procedure) have been allowed.

2. Briefly stated, the Plaintiffs (Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 herein) have filed a Civil Suit on 6-9-2005 against the Petitioner as also against the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 (Plaintiffs' father and mother) and 9 (State Government) seeking declaration of partition and permanent injunction in respect to the agricultural land. It was alleged that the said land being ancestral property of their family, which fell in their share as per the family arrangement carried out 5-7 years back, the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4, could not have sold the same to the Petitioner (Defendant No. 1).

3. The Petitioner who had purchased the said land from the Defendant Nos. 2 and 3 by way of a registered sale deed executed on 4-7-2005 for consideration of Rs. 3.24 lakhs filed written statement alongwi
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top