SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 410

SHANTANU KEMKAR, S.C.SHARMA
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Onkar Lal – Respondent


ORDER

As per Shantanu Kemkar, J.

1. Heard on the question of admission.

2. By this writ appeal, the appellants have challenged the order dated 6-9-2006 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. (S) No. 3238 of 2006.

3. Briefly stated the respondent was appointed vide order dated 9-10-1984 issued by the Superintending Engineer, Narmada Vikas Division No. 10, Indore on being selected by a duly constituted Departmental Selection Committee. In his order of appointment a condition was imposed to pass Hindi Typing Examination within two years with a further stipulation that only after one year of passing of such examination he will be entitled for the benefit of regular increments.

4. Thereafter in his passing of the Hindi Typing Examination from the recognized Institute, the appellant released the regular increments in favour of the respondent in terms of his appointment order.

5. Feeling aggrieved by non-release of the increments after one year of his initial appointment, the respondent herein filed W.P. No. 3238 of 2006 claiming increments from the date of his appointment.

6. The learned Single Judge after considering the various orders passed from time to time including an order






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top