SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 316

ALOK ARADHE
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Afzal Anees – Respondent


ORDER

Alok Aradhe, J.

1. In this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has called in question the validity of the order dated 7-2-2009 by which the application preferred by the petitioner under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been rejected.

2. In view of the law laid down by this Court in Sawal Singh Vs. Ramsakhi (Smt.) 2002 (4) M.P.H.T. 200 : 2002 (2) MPLJ 201, civil revision is maintainable against the order passed in execution proceeding.

3. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the validity of the impugned order in civil revision, if so advised. The office is directed to supply the certified copy of the impugned order filed along with this petition to the learned Counsel for the petitioner on substitution thereof by photocopy.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top