SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 368

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
Rashid Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Mr. A.K. Shrivastava, J.

1. This is plaintiff's first appeal since their suit for declaration and injunction has been dismissed by learned Trial Court.

2. The facts necessary for the disposal of this appeal lie in narrow compass. Suffice it to say that a suit for declaration and injunction in respect of a house, the description whereof has been mentioned in the plaint and which is the subject matter of the suit, has been filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants/respondents on the averments that they have purchased the suit property from Mohammad Sabir on 27-7-1990 and 16-2-1990 by two registered sale-deeds (Exhs. P-1 and P-2) and entered into possession of the suit property. Further the case of the plaintiffs is that their vendor purchased the suit property from Qamal Abbas Khan who was the surviving heir of Musharraf Jahan Begum, the owner of the suit property vide registered sale-deed dated 2-12-1986 and thus, they are the owner of the suit property, but, the respondents/defendants are trying to interfere into their possession. It is the further case of plaintiffs that Sub-Divisional Officer/Additional District Magistrate vide order dated 5-10-1991 in Case No.













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top