SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 346

SANJAY YADAV
Divisiya W/o Naresh Paraste – Appellant
Versus
Shanta W/o Narayan Singh Pusham – Respondent


ORDER

Sanjay Yadav, J.

1. Shri Paritosh Trivedi, learned Counsel for the Petitioner.

Shri D.R. Vishwakarma, learned Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

Shri S.P. Rai, learned Govt. Advocate for Respondent No. 3.

With consent of learned Counsel for parties the petition is heard finally.

2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 3-5-2010 passed by Respondent No. 3 in an election petition preferred by Respondent No. 1.

3. Election Petition under Section 122 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhihiyam, 1993 is directed against the election of the Petitioner as Sarpahch of Village Panchayat, Kohka in an election held on 18- 1-2010. On being served, Petitioner herein, who was Respondent No. 1 in the election petition has raised an objection under Rule 8 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayats (Election Petitions, Corrupt Practices and Disqualification for Membership) Rules, 1995 (Rules of 1995 for short) for dismissal of election petition on the ground of non-compliance of provisions of Rules 3,4 and 7.

4. It was stated that the additional copy of election petition was not accompanied with election petition and mat other cand


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top