SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 840

RAJENDRA MENON
Vijay Kumar Bajpayee – Appellant
Versus
M. P. Urja Vikas Nigam Limited – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Rajendra Menon, J.

1. As common questions are involved in all these petitions and as challenge made in these petitions are to order dated 31.7.2008, by which services of the Petitioners are being retrenched in accordance to the provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, all these petitions are being heard and decided by this order. For the sake of convenience and as requested for by the parties, documents filed and the pleadings available in the record of W.P. No. 9989/2008 is being referred to in this order.

2. The Petitioners were employed in the establishment of the Respondents in various capacities. As far as Petitioner Vijay Kumar Bajpayee, in W.P. No. 9989/2008(S), is concerned, he was appointed as a Junior Assistant vide order-dated 23.5.1990. It is the case of this Petitioner that he was appointed in the regular establishment of the Respondents, whereas it is the case of the Respondents that each of the Petitioner was appointed in a particular Project known as Integrated Rural Energy Programme (hereinafter referred to as 'IREP'). According to the Petitioner Vijay Kumar Bajpayee, his initial appointment vide Annexure P/1 on 23.5.90 was on probation



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top