A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
Natthulal – Appellant
Versus
Shakuntalabai – Respondent
A.K. Shrivastava, J.
1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner/election Petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'election Petitioner') has challenged the validity of the impugned order dated 31-5-2010 by which the Election Tribunal has dismissed the election petition of the election Petitioner on account of non-compliance of Rules 3(2) and 8 of Madhya Pradesh Panchayats (Election Petitions, Corrupt Practices and Disqualification for Membership) Rules, 1995 (hereinafter referred as the Rules).
3. The facts leading to this petition lie in a narrow compass. Suffice it to say that the Petitioner who is a voter has filed an election petition before the Election Tribunal praying to declare the election of Respondent No. 1 on the post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Bharatpur to be illegal since she was not having requisite qualification to contest the election of the said Gram Panchayat.
4. The election petition was filed on 18-2-2010. On bare perusal of the order sheet of that date, it is gathered that the Respondent No. 1 was directed to be summoned on payment of process fee. Accordingly, summons were issued but returned back unserved. On 15-3-2
3. Rama Banjara v. Kanchhedilal 1998 (1) MPWN 90;
7. T.S. Murugesam Pillai v. M.D. Gnana Sambandha Pandara Sannadhi and Ors. AIR 1917 PC 6
5. Gopal Krishnaji Ketkar v. Mohamed Haji Latif and Ors. 1969 MPLJ (SC) 271 : AIR 1968 SC 1413;
1. Lata Patle v. Smt. Kamlesh Gautam 2008 (1) MPLJ 388;
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.