SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 57

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
Natthulal – Appellant
Versus
Shakuntalabai – Respondent


ORDER

A.K. Shrivastava, J.

1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner/election Petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'election Petitioner') has challenged the validity of the impugned order dated 31-5-2010 by which the Election Tribunal has dismissed the election petition of the election Petitioner on account of non-compliance of Rules 3(2) and 8 of Madhya Pradesh Panchayats (Election Petitions, Corrupt Practices and Disqualification for Membership) Rules, 1995 (hereinafter referred as the Rules).

3. The facts leading to this petition lie in a narrow compass. Suffice it to say that the Petitioner who is a voter has filed an election petition before the Election Tribunal praying to declare the election of Respondent No. 1 on the post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Bharatpur to be illegal since she was not having requisite qualification to contest the election of the said Gram Panchayat.

4. The election petition was filed on 18-2-2010. On bare perusal of the order sheet of that date, it is gathered that the Respondent No. 1 was directed to be summoned on payment of process fee. Accordingly, summons were issued but returned back unserved. On 15-3-2













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top