SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 335

SUSHIL HARKAULI, PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA
O. R. G. Informatics Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Madhya Pradesh State Electronics Development Corporation Ltd. – Respondent


ORDER

Sushil Harkauli, J.

1. The first respondent invited bids by way of tenders for a certain project. The tenders consisted of three parts namely (1) pre-qualification bid (2) technical bid and (3) financial bid. The tender conditions permitted the tenders to be submitted by any organization/company or a consortium.

2. The writ petitioner formed a consortium (hereinafter in this order referred to as the consortium) with the third respondent i.e. Wipro Ltd. Amongst the members of the consortium, the petitioner declared itself as the prime bidder. 'Prime bidder' means some kind of a managing partner of a consortium, who acts on behalf of the consortium and with whom interaction in respect of the bidding activities is to take place. In respect of the tender submitted by it, the said consortium qualified in evaluation of the pre-qualification bid and thereafter also qualified in the evaluation of the technical bid. However, for passing these two stages, membership of the Wipro in the consortium played an important and material role as is mentioned in paragraph No. 15 of the return of the first respondent.

3. According to that paragraph no. 15, under the parameters prescribed for the purp























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top