SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 485

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Vimla Jain
Hakam
Vs.
State of M.P.
Cr.Rev. No. 985/2011
Decided On: 08.07.2011

The main legal point established is that the grant of bail to a juvenile should be governed by the provisions of Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act, and specific exceptions for denying bail must be clearly demonstrated with supporting evidence.

Headnote:

Juvenile - Bail under Juvenile Justice Act - 12 - The court discussed and referenced Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000, which mandates the release of a juvenile on bail unless specific exceptions are met. The exceptions include the likelihood of the juvenile coming into association with known criminals, exposure to moral, physical, or psychological danger, or the release defeating the ends of justice.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved a juvenile accused of committing rape. The Special Judge denied bail based on the heinous nature of the offence and the tender age of the victim.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the nature of the offence and the interests of justice are not grounds for denying bail to a juvenile. It emphasized that bail for a juvenile should be considered purely under the parameters of Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act.

Issues: The issues revolved around the denial of bail to a juvenile accused of a heinous offence and the interpretation of Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that bail for a juvenile should be considered solely under the provisions of Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act, and the exceptions for denying bail must be clearly established with supporting evidence.

Final Decision: The court set aside the impugned order and directed the release of the juvenile on bail, emphasizing the entitlement to bail under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act.

ORDER

Vimla Jain, J.

1. This is a criminal revision under Section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for setting aside the judgment dated 18/04/ 2011 passed by the Special Judge, Sagar and for granting bail to the applicant.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 08/03/2011 at about 5.00 p.m., the prosecutrix, daughter of Jagat Singh Ahirwar, was playing in front of her house. The appellant allured her to play with him, took her in cattle house (sar) of Baliram and committed rape with her.

3. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is young boy of 16 years. He is a juvenile. He is an student of 8th class. He is entitled for bail.

4. Learned counsel for the State supported the impugned order. However, he could not point out as to how the present case would fall under any of the three exceptions mentioned in Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act").

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6. The learned Special Judge dismissed the bail on the ground that he nature of offence is quite heinous. Keeping in view the tender age of 7 years of victim, it shall not be justified to release him on bail from moral, psychological and social angles.

7. It is well settled legal position that once a person is held to be a juvenile delinquent, then Section 12 of the Act, 2000 would govern the question of grant of bail and custody of juvenile and it will not be governed by the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

8. Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000, reads as under:-

12. Bail of Juvenile:-(1) When any person accused of a bail able or non-bail able offence, and apparently a juvenile, is arrested or detained or appears or is brought before a Board, such person shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or in any other law for the time being in force, be released on bail with or without surety but he shall not be so released if there appear reasonable grounds for believing that the release is likely to bring him into association with any known criminal or expose him to moral, physical or psychological danger or that his release would defeat the ends of justice.

9. The position of law with regard to grant of bail to a juvenile under Section 12 of the Act, is clear that a juvenile has to be released on bail mandatorily unless and until the exceptions carved out in the section itself are made out. The first exception is a reasonable ground for believing that the release is likely to bring the juvenile into association with any known criminal. The second exception is that the release of the juvenile is likely to expose him to any moral, physical or psychological danger. Both these exceptions are not made out because there is no material available in the record of the case to suggest any such association or exposure. The third exception is that the release of the juvenile would defeat the ends of the justice.

10. The impugned order is based on the serious nature of the offence as well as the release of the petitioner not being in the interest of justice. The nature of the offence is not one of the conditions on which bail can be granted or refused to the juvenile. Bail, in respect of a juvenile, has to be considered purely under the parameters of Section 12 of the Act which requires bail to be granted mandatorily unless the court feels that the release of the juvenile is likely to bring him in the association of any known criminal or expose him to moral, physical or psychological danger or that his release would defeat the ends of justice.

11. The prosecution did not bring on record any material or report of the Probation Officer, to show mat the release of the delinquent juvenile on bail is likely to bring him into the association with any known criminal or expose him to moral, physical or psychological danger or his re



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top