SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 554

ABHAY M.NAIK
Mahesh Chandra – Appellant
Versus
Kamal Kumar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Abhay M. Nak, J.

1. This first appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff against dismissal of his money suit for recovery of Rs. 64,000/- by the Court of 15th ADJ, Indore vide judgment and decree dated 16.08.2005 passed in Civil Suit No. 13-B/2005.

2. Briefly stated relevant facts are that the plaintiff/appellant instituted a suit for recovery of Rs. 64,000/-with allegations that the defendant, on account of his need, received a sum of Rs. 50,000/-for his business in the name and style of M/s. Neha Pulses and executed a receipt in his own handwriting and under his own signature on 05.01.2000 on his letterhead. Interest was orally agreed at the rate of 1.50% per month. Defendant did not make the repayment Consequently, demand notice was issued by the plaintiff to the defendant on 06.07.2001. Service was avoided by the defendant and consequently, notice came back unserved. Thus, the plaintiff instituted suit for Rs. 64,000/-, which included interest to the tune of Rs. 13,750/- and notice expenses Rs. 250/-.

Defendant, after being served with the summons, submitted his written statement refuting thereby averments contained in the plaint. He, inter-alia, stated that he had no acq























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top