SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 619

VIMLA JAIN, KRISHN KUMAR LAHOTI
Kishan Automobile – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


ORDER

Krishn Kumar Lahoti, J.

1. The Order of the Court was delivered by :-This is a reference by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench, Jabalpur in R.A.No. 13/Jab/1992, by which following question has been referred for the opinion of this Court:-

Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in the light of the provisions of Sec.43-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as existed, originally and after amendment, the Tribunal was justified in sustaining the addition of Rs. 51,918/- on account of sales tax liability?

2. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that to give effect to the provisions as contained in section 43B, first proviso was inserted w.e.f. 1989, but it was curative in nature and has to be given retrospective effect. Section 43B(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was inserted to meet out various difficulties. He has placed reliance to the Apex Court judgment in Allied Motors (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax [ (1997) 224 ITR 677] and Whirlpool of India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax [(2000) 162 CTR (SC) 308] and submitted that this reference may be answered in favour of the assessee.

3. Shri Sanjay Lal, learned counsel appearing fo







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top