SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 651

ABHAY M.NAIK
Ghanshyam – Appellant
Versus
Subhashchandra – Respondent


ORDER

Abhay M. Naik, J.

1. This revision petition has been submitted by the tenant against the order of eviction passed by the Court of Rent Controlling Authority, Indore on 08.04.2011 in Eviction Case No. A-90 (7) 8 / 09-10.

2. Admitted facts of the case are that the revisionist is a tenant of respondent in the suit shop comprised in House No. 33 situated in Morsali Gali, Ward No. 9, Indore, on rent at the rate of Rs. 530/- per month. Respondent has been retired from the services of Municipal Corporation, Indore on 30.06.2004 as Head Clerk. Eviction of tenant has been claimed by the respondent for the bona fide need of his major son, namely, Kamlesh to start the business of jewelery. Landlord/respondent submitted an application for eviction under Section 23-A (b) of the MP Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) with the allegations that he and/or Kamlesh does not have any other alternative vacant nonresidential accommodation for the purpose of business in the city of Indore. The application for eviction was opposed on the ground that Kamlesh is running a cosmetic business with his wife in shop situated in Bakhtawar Ram Nagar, Indore. It is further stated




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top