S.C.SINHO, ARUN MISHRA
M. M. Traders – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
Arun Mishra J.
1. The question for consideration in these writ petitions is whether the sale could be said to be inter-State sale.
2. In some of the writ petitions, the Petitioners are based in Madhya Pradesh. They are also holding the export licence and they are the dealer registered under the provisions of the M. P. Commercial Tax Act/VAT Act.
3. The Petitioners/purchasers are based at Gujarat or some other State in Writ Petition Nos. 16782 of 2007, 16783 of 2007, 16785 of 2007, 16787 of 2007, 16788 of 2007, 16790 of 2007, 8996 of 2010, 2054 of 2008, 7018 of 2009, 2052 of 2008, 2053 of 2008.
4. It is averred in Writ Petition No. 12790 of 2008 that the Petitioners are registered dealers in Madhya Pradesh and they purchased tendu leaves (tendupatta) sold by the M. P. State Minor Forest Product (Trading and Development) Cooperative Federation Limited (hereinafter referred to as, "the Federation"). They are also registered under the M. P. Tendupatta Vyapar Viniyaman Regulation, 1966 to sell tendu leaves in other States in the course of inter-State trade and commerce after paying the prescribed registration fee. They are also registered as exporters and they are required to sell tend
Coffee Board Bangalore v. Joint Commercial Tax Officer Madras (1970) 25 STC 528
Oil India Ltd. v. Superintendent of Taxes (1975) 35 STC 445 (SC) :(1975) 1 SCC 733
State of Bihar v. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. (1971) 27 STC 127 :(1970) 3 SCC 697
Tata Iron and Steel Co. Limited
Union of India v. K.G. Khosla and Co. Ltd. (1979) 43 STC 457 (SC) : (1979) 2 SCC 242
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.