SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(MP) 99

G.L.OZA
JAGATSINGH BARELAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M P COLLECTOR VIDISHA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.C.JAIN, N.P.Mittal,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS Second appeal has been filed by the plaintiff-appellant against the judgment passed by the Additional District Judge, vidisha, in Civil Appeal No. 139-A of 1971 dated 4th April 1972 confirming the judgment and decree passed by the Additional Civil Judge, Class II, kurwai, dated I8th September 1970, in Civil Suit No. 5i-A of 1968, dismissing the suit of the plaintiff-appellant as barred by time.

( 2. ) THE facts necessary for disposal of this appeal are that Pragsingh, randhirsingh and Jujharsingh were the original holders of land including the land in dispute. A draft-statement was prepared under the M. P. Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the act,) and was published as contemplated under Sub-section (3) of Section 11 thereof. It is not in dispute that an intimation or notice of this draft-statement was not given to the plaintiff-appellant, but it appears that having learnt about it, an objection was filed by the plaintiff-appellant which was rejected by the competent Authority by his order dated 30th December 1967 holding that the objections were filed beyond time provided in Section II of the Act.

( 3. ) IN the year 1963, th

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top