SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(MP) 224

G.P.SINGH, FAIZAN UDDIN
Commissioner of Sales Tax – Appellant
Versus
Bombay Garage – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
O.P.NAMDEO, S.C.Mohabey,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THE question of law referred by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Board of Revenue) is as follows :

Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the expression electric motors, refrigerators and allied machines would include air coolers and whether the Tribunal was justified in setting aside penalty under Section 10a of the Central Sales Tax Act ?

( 2. ) THE assessees registration certificate mentioned the following articles : "petrol, motor parts, refrigerators and allied machines w. e. f. 22nd August, 1957. Lubricants, greases, tyres, diesel engines, new cars and trucks, buses, electric motors, frigidaire parts.

( 3. ) THE assessee imported air coolers between 10th January, 1968, and 9th April, 1971, and issued declarations in C form. The assessing authority imposed penalty under Section 10a read with Section 10 (b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, on the ground that air coolers were not covered by the registration certificate of the assessee. The assessees appeal was rejected by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax. In second appeal, the Tribunal came to the conclusion that the assessee was under a bona fide belief that air coolers were covered unde




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top